Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided April 8, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Honorable Macy,

The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect:

1. Are the provisions of 34 O.S. 9 (1984), applicable to a county election held pursuant to 37 O.S. 590 (1985) that is submitted by the Board of County Commissioners to a vote of the people of said county?

2. What responsibilities and duties do the county officials have regarding an election held pursuant to 37 O.S. 590 (1985)?

3. What form must a proposition have that is submitted to a vote of the people pursuant to 37 O.S. 590 (1985)?

State Question No. 563, Initiative Petition No. 319,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Development Industries, Inc. v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Arthur v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. McKiever v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Solomon v. North Shore Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API