Taylor v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and punishment was assessed at eight years imprisonment pursuant to a plea agreement. This conviction was affirmed. Taylor v. State, 850 S.W.2d 294 and 850 S.W.2d 594 (Tex.App.—Hou.[lst] 1993).
Appellant appealed the denial of a motion to suppress all evidence seized as a result of his arrest. At the hearing on the motion two officers testified concerning both the circumstances of Appellant’s arrest and police department policies concerning custodial arrests for Class C…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Rhett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
4Cited by8 opinions
- Melugin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- State v. KlimaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Clement, David Lee Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Killian, Edwin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
- Killian, Jr., Edwin Wallace v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.