Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gray Maria v. William Muniz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2017No. 15-56272Unpublished

1DissentMurguia, Circuit Judge

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion as to Maria’s claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in the guilt phase.

During the guilt phase of a bifurcated, first-degree murder trial, a defendant can introduce expert testimony opining that the defendant’s mental “illness caused him to obey a command hallucination to” commit the murder, and therefore the defendant “was incapable of harboring the necessary premeditation [and] deliberation.” People v. Duckett, 162 Cal.App.3d 1115, 209 Cal.Rptr. 96, 100-01 (1984).

In the present case, both experts acknowledged that Maria experienced command…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Duncan v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Pedro Vega v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API