Gray Maria v. William Muniz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentMurguia, Circuit Judge
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion as to Maria’s claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in the guilt phase.
During the guilt phase of a bifurcated, first-degree murder trial, a defendant can introduce expert testimony opining that the defendant’s mental “illness caused him to obey a command hallucination to” commit the murder, and therefore the defendant “was incapable of harboring the necessary premeditation [and] deliberation.” People v. Duckett, 162 Cal.App.3d 1115, 209 Cal.Rptr. 96, 100-01 (1984).
In the present case, both experts acknowledged that Maria experienced command…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pedro Vega v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.