Legal Opinion

Pedro Vega v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2014No. 12-15631PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed November 13, 2013, and appearing at 735 F.3d 1093, is with drawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner Pedro Imperial Vega was convicted of sexually abusing his stepdaughter. In this appeal of the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Vega argues that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective when he failed to review Vega’s client file and, as a result, failed to call as a witness a Catholic priest to whom the victim had recanted her allegations of her…

3Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Paul Zapata v. Rodolfo VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Sarah Weeden v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Murray Hooper v. David ShinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Seifullah Abdul-Salaam v. Secretary Pennsylvania DepartmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Khan MohammedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API