Legal Opinion

City of Quincy v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a bill for instructions, brought by the city of Quincy as trustee under the will of Ebenezer Woodward of property devised to it upon certain charitable trusts. The Trustees of Dartmouth College, to whom the property is limited over in certain events, are made defendants, and, although no instructions are asked on that point, they set up a claim to the property on the ground that the plaintiff has broken the conditions imposed by the will. Perhaps, under the decisions in this State, instructions could be asked as to whether there had been a forfeiture. Fairbanks v. Belknap, 135 Mass.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Cary Library v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. EXECUTORS OF McDONOGH v. MURDOCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Bullard v. Inhabitants of ShirleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Maxcy v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Attorney General v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Trustees of Dartmouth College v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. White v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API