Legal Opinion

EXECUTORS OF McDONOGH v. MURDOCH

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 27, 1854PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

56 U.S. 367 (1853)

15 How. 367

THE EXECUTORS OF JOHN McDONOGH, DECEASED, AND OTHERS,

v.

MARY MURDOCH AND OTHERS, HEIRS OF JOHN McDONOGH, DECEASED.

Supreme Court of United States.

It was argued by Mr. Brent, Mr. May, and Mr. Hunt, for the appellants, and by Mr. Benjamin and Mr. Johnson for the appellees.

2Opinion of the Court · CampbellJustice Campbell

The appellees are the heirs at law of John McDonogh, a native of the State of Maryland, who died at McDonogh, near New Orleans, in the State of Louisiana, in 1850, leaving there a very large succession. In 1839, the decedent executed, at New Orleans, an olographic will for the disposal of the estate…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Runyan v. Lessee of CosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. In re HoweNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  3. Duke of Richmond v. Milne's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  4. First Municipality of New Orleans v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  5. Prevost v. MartelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by64 opinions

  1. Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Russell v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Potter v. CouchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Perin Ex Rel. Perin v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1861

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API