State v. Bauer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207, and appeals from the resulting judgment.
His first assignment of error challenges the sufficiency of the affidavit as a result of which a search warrant was issued, resulting in the seizure of substantial quantities of drugs. The trial court held the affidavit to be sufficient and refused to grant Ms motion to suppress.
In State v. Metler, 6 Or App 356, 360-61, 487 P2d 1377 (1971), we said:
“The basic principles of law are axiomatic. A search warrant cannot issue except upon probable cause. Spinelli v. United States,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.