Legal Opinion

(PS) Wilde v. County of Butte

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 30, 2020No. 2:20-cv-02166Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLE MATTHEW WILDE, No. 2:20-cv-02166 TLN AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF BUTTE; BUTTE COUNTY SHERRIF’S OFFICE, JASON MILLER, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a pre-trial detainee in Butte County Jail. ECF No. 1 at 17. 18 He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. 19 Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the necessary showing that he is unable 20 to afford the cost of suit and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Shawna Hartmann v. California Department of Corr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API