Legal Opinion

Dupont v. Labbe

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 7, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.

Exceptions to the granting of a review of an action in which the petitioner was defaulted on his failure to enter an appearance are overruled.

The petition is based upon R. S. Ch. 110, Sec. 1, Clause VII. The applicable law is found in Donnell v. Hodsdon, 102 Me. 420, at 422, 67 A. 143, at 144, as follows:

“Under clause VII upon which this petition is based, the petitioner is not entitled to a review unless he proves to the satisfaction of the court at nisi prius three propositions; (1) that justice has not been done; (2) that the consequent injustice was through fraud, accident, mistake or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Charlesworth v. American Express Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  2. Bourisk v. Mohican Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  3. Fournier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  4. Goodwin v. PrimeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  5. Sard v. SardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. CarignanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  2. Munsey v. Public Loan CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API