Legal Opinion
Fournier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 16, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.
The City of Brewer, having paid or become liable for compensation awarded the nominal plaintiffs for injuries alleged to have been received by them as a result of the negligence of an employee of the defendant corporation, brings these two actions under its right of subrogation given by the Workmen’s Compensation Act in Sec. 26, Chap. 238 of the Public Laws of 1919, as *396amended by Sec. 8 of Chap. 222, Public Laws of 1921. Tried together below, the cases come forward in one record on exceptions and general motions for new trials.
The two cases are given a single consideration on this review. It…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gumb v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Tomlinson v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- West Chicago Street Railroad v. McCallumIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Rogers v. Union Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- McCarthy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Bourisk v. Mohican Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- American Oil Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Buzynski v. County of KnoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.