Legal Opinion

Ford v. Watson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 25, 1984No. 0183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The appellants, heirs at law of Favor Gore, seek to have their title to certain real estate previously owned by their ancestor established by adverse possession and quieted against the claims of the respondents. The respondents, Watson, Heniford, McDowell and Windham, assert that they own the property in question and further, that in court actions in 1974 and 1978, the question of title was decided adversely to the heirs’ claims.

The matter was referred to the master in equity under provisions of Section 15-31-10, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, for the entry of a final…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griggs v. GriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Wold v. FunderburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nunnery v. Brantley Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. North Carolina Electric Membership Corp. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
  3. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Winyah Nursing Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Yarbrough v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Nunnery v. Brantley Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API