Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nunnery v. Brantley Construction Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 1986No. 0738Published

1DissentCureton, Judge

(dissenting):. I disagree with the majority’s holding that Brantley’s claim for arbitration is barred by principles of res judicata. In disagreeing, I view the facts somewhat differently from the majority.

*212The record before us contains no live testimony, but only the pleadings and affidavits of several persons.1 As I view the pleadings,. contract and affidavits, the following facts appear.2 Brantley and Nunnery entered into a contract that required Nunnery to install a new roof on a Navy building. Nunnery installed the roof defectively, thus requiring Nunnery to perform certain repairs to it.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Charles J. Frank, Inc. v. Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Vincent v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bagwell v. HintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API