Legal Opinion

QRG, LTD. v. Nartron Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 2007No. Civil 1:06-CV-1777Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.

This case arises out of a dispute over whether some of Plaintiff QRG, Ltd.’s (“QRG”) products infringe Defendant Nar-tron Corporation’s (“Nartron”) patents. QRG seeks a declaratory judgment by the court, declaring that its products do not violate Nartron’s patents (U.S. patents: 4,731,548; 4,758,735; 4,831,279; 5,087,825; 5,796,183 (“patents”)). Nartron has filed this motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), claiming that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Nartron alleges that jurisdiction is lacking because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API