Legal Opinion
Sherritt v. Rocky Mountain Fire District
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 2009No. 08CA0914PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROMÁN.
In this action under the Fair Campaign Practices Act, sections 1-45-101 to -118, C.R.S.2008, petitioner, Jay Sherritt, appeals the sanction imposed upon respondent, Rocky Mountain Fire District (RMF). We affirm.
I. Background
The parties are in general agreement regarding the underlying facts. Ballot issue 5A was a measure for consideration during the November 2007 election. The measure was designed to exempt RMF from the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR), Colo. Const, art. X, § 20, and the 5.5% limit imposed by section 29-1-301, C.R.S.2008.
Prior to the election, the RMF…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coffman v. Colorado Common CauseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Kauntz v. HCA-HEALTHONE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- National Farmers Union Property v. Estate of MosherColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Colorado Real Estate Commission v. HaneganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- League of Women Voters of Colorado v. DavidsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colorado Real Estate Commission v. BartlettColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. ConnorsColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Campaign Integrity Watchdog, LLC v. Colorado Citizens Protecting our ConstitutionColorado Court of Appeals · 2018