In Interest of Baby Girl K.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentBeilfuss, C.J.
The majority affirms the trial court’s termination of B.B.’s parental rights, holding that the statutory grounds for involuntary termination were met and that due process does not require a finding of parental unfitness before termination. Because the record before this court does not support the holding that the statutory grounds were met, and because I believe due process requires a finding of unfitness before B.B.’s rights can be terminated, I dissent.
The majority glosses over the nature of the interest at stake in an involuntary termination hearing. Therefore I must start with an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.