Legal Opinion
Cancian v. Hannabass and Rowe, Inc
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided July 19, 2019No. 7:18-cv-00283Unknown
1Opinion
FAL FILED Wek JUL 19 20%9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUL FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA UOLEY CLERK ROANOKE DIVISION PU ALLESANDRO CANCIAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00283 v. ) ) HANNABASS AND ROWE, LTD., _) ) and ) ) LINDSAY MICHELLE STINSON, |) ) Defendants. ) By: Michael F. Urbanski ) Chief U.S. District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the court on a number of motions filed by defendants Hannabass and Rowe, Ltd. (“Hannabass”) and Lindsay Michelle Stinson (“Stinson”). The first of these is Hannabass and Stinson’s (collectively,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.