Legal Opinion
People v. Sher
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.
The defendants Katie Sher and Antonio Escriva are charged, inter alla, with unauthorized practice of a profession (medicine) (Education Law § 6512 [1]; § 6521) based on the allegation that between November 1, 1986, and February 1, 1990, Sher, a doctor, aided and abetted Escriva, who is not a licensed physician, in the unauthorized practice of medicine. *195The defendants contend that this count is duplicitous. Relying primarily upon People v Firth (157 App Div 492 [2d Dept 1913]), People v Ellis (162 App Div 288 [2d Dept 1914]), and People v Lee (151…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. KeindlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- People v. OkaforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. BeauchampNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. LeeNew York Court of Special Session · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. MintonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996