Legal Opinion

Laflin v. Shackleford

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1899No. 823PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBY, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on an account for services rendered as attorneys at law, brought by Thomas M. Shackle-ford and H. B. K. Pettingill, late partners as Shackleford £; Pettin-gill, against Albert S. Laflin and John P. Laflin. ‘ Judgment was had for the plaintiffs in the court below for $2,700, and the defendants bring the case to this court to reverse the judgment.

1. The first assignment of error is that the court erred in allowing the plaintiffs during the trial to amend the bill of particulars attached to the declaration by adding thereto an item “for legal services in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Packet Co. v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company v. Knapp and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edward Valves, Inc., and Rockwell Manufacturing Company v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Ricketts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  3. Walker Mfg. Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API