Perelson v. Podolsky
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
Judgment by confession was entered against the defendants on a judgment note signed by them. On motion to vacate, the court, after hearing testimony, denied the motion.
By their testimony defendants sought to prove that the money for which they signed the note was a present to them from the plaintiff and that they thought they were signing simply a receipt instead of a note. Plaintiff denied that she gave the money as a gift to the defendants, and said it was a loan to them. We see no sufficient reason to disagree with the conclusion of the trial court in finding with the plaintiff on this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wuller v. Chuse Grocery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Cole v. PennoyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- Briggs v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Coe v. MoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Reid v. DegenerIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martinez v. CoganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Terrace Co. v. CalhounAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Goodman American Ice Cream Co. v. MendelsohnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934