Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Cogan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 4, 1943No. Gen. No. 42,532PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

On February 11, 1933, plaintiff, in the municipal court of Chicago, obtained a judgment by confession against Mary Cogan, Milton L. Cogan and Barney Taub in the sum of $2,167. On May 6, 1942, plaintiff filed a suit to revive the judgment against the three defendants in the original suit. On July 22, 1942, plaintiff filed an amended statement of claim, as follows : •

“The plaintiff claims as follows:
“1. The plaintiff, on the 11th day of February, 1933, recovered in this court in Case No. 2764649 a judgment against the defendants for $2167.00 and $29.20 costs.
“2. Said judgment is in full force…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seymour v. O. S. Richardson Fueling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Byers v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Sherwood v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. VanNorman v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Alling v. StrakaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pruellage v. De Seaton CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Foreman v. Illinois Hair & Feather Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Prairie Production Credit Ass'n v. BianucciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Columbia Hardwood Lumber Co. v. E. Kopriwa Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Prairie Production Credit Ass'n v. BianucciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API