Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Robinson, Also Known as Fuzzy
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 25, 2002No. 01-3038PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Clarence Robinson appeals from the District Court’s 1 denial of Ms 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We affirm.
In 1995, after a jury trial in federal district court, Robinson was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and sentenced to life imprisonment. 2 Subsequently, Robinson brought his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Following a hearing, the District Court denied relief and this Court granted Robinson’s application for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Monte Allen ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Vincent Edward Fields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Joseph Amrine v. Michael Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Clarence RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John Middleton v. Don Roper, 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Rodela-Aguilar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Alfred Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.