Legal Opinion

William F. Luebke Co. v. Manhardt

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 7, 1941No. Civ. A. No. 444PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon a motion by all of the defendants for a more definite statement and a bill of particulars. The complaint herein is based upon Secs. 1 and 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. and 15 note. The sixteen defendants named have been engaged in the building supply business. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was a purchaser of building supplies from manufacturers outside of Wisconsin and was a competitor of the defendants; that said defendants do approximately 90% of the building supply business in Milwaukee County…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
  2. Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  3. Ware-Kramer Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  3. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  4. Ketcher v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1953
  5. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API