Legal Opinion
In Re: M/V Ram XVII
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided December 11, 2024No. 6:22-cv-00998Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:22-cv-0998 IN RE: M/V RAM XVII JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AYO MEMORANDUM RULING Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Aries Marine Corporation (“Aries Marine”). See Record Document 81. Specifically, Aries Marine argues there is no genuine issue of material fact that Dylan Rose (“Rose”) is not a seaman but is a maritime worker covered under the Longshore Harbor Workers Compensation Act (“LHWCA”). See Record Document 81-1 at 8. Thus, Aries Marine submits it is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V RisanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.