Legal Opinion
Henkel v. XIM Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1991No. Civ. No. 4-89-92PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FRANKLIN L. NOEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter was before the undersigned United States Magistrate on November 16, 1990 upon plaintiff’s motion for a protective order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) that discovery not be had. James M. Sherburne, Esq. appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. John M. Anderson, Esq. appeared on behalf of XIM Products, Inc. Ted E. Sulli*557van, Esq. appeared on behalf of Lindstrom Cleaning and Construction, Inc. Lathrop Paint Supply Company made no appearance.
Roy Klostermeyer, a former employee of XIM Products, Inc. (XIM), is a non-party witness, who lives…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Earl Charles v. F. W. Wade, Leo B. Ryan and City of Savannah, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Wright Root Beer Company of New Orleans, Incorporated v. Dr. Pepper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Rosenthal v. Peoples Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
3Cited by17 opinions
- Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaADistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
- Maresh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Estenfelder v. Gates Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Estate of Thompson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Smith v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.