Legal Opinion

Abend v. MCA, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1988No. Nos. 87-5780, 87-5833 and 87-5922PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Abend, owner of the renewal copyright on the original story on which the motion picture “Rear Window” was based, brought suit against MCA and the trustees and executors of Alfred Hitchcock’s estate and assets. Abend’s complaint alleges copyright infringement based on defendants’ re-release of the “Rear Window” film in theatres, on TV, and on videocassette. The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the Second Circuit’s decision in Rohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc., 551 F.2d 484 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 949, 97 S.Ct. 2666, 53…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Terry Gilliam, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Stewart v. AbendSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API