Legal Opinion

Graf v. Tastemaker

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 15, 1995No. 95-D-2673PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DANIEL, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Change Venue filed November 13, 1995, and the Response and Reply thereto. Defendant seeks to transfer venue to the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) for the convenience of the parties and witnesses.

28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) provides as follows:

For the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.

Id. This statute vests the Court with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
  3. Consumers Gas & Oil, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  4. Injection Research Specialists v. Polaris Industries, L.P.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  5. Broadview Financial, Inc. v. Entech Management Services Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. MD Buyline, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Cummings v. Western Trial Lawyers Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API