Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Foster & Kester Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1951No. Appeal, 258PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff instituted this action in assumpsit by the issuance of a summons without more. One of the defendants, the present appellant, being a foreign corporation, filed preliminary objections to the jurisdiction on the ground that it was not doing business in Pennsylvania and, therefore, was not amenable to service in a suit instituted against it in this State. The plaintiff filed an answer to the preliminary objections and a hearing was had in the court below. On the testimony adduced by deposition and certain exhibits offered in evidence, the court made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. New v. Robinson-Houchin Optical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Holliday v. Pacific Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Partin v. Michaels Art Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Wenzel v. Morris Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Florio v. Powder Power Tool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  5. Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API