Lutz v. Foster & Kester Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The plaintiff instituted this action in assumpsit by the issuance of a summons without more. One of the defendants, the present appellant, being a foreign corporation, filed preliminary objections to the jurisdiction on the ground that it was not doing business in Pennsylvania and, therefore, was not amenable to service in a suit instituted against it in this State. The plaintiff filed an answer to the preliminary objections and a hearing was had in the court below. On the testimony adduced by deposition and certain exhibits offered in evidence, the court made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- New v. Robinson-Houchin Optical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Holliday v. Pacific Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by63 opinions
- Partin v. Michaels Art Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Wenzel v. Morris Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Florio v. Powder Power Tool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.