Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Houghtaling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Case made after judgment from Cass. Ejectment. Defendant had judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

This was an action of ejectment, brought by one of the children and heirs-at-law of Pul of D. Orego, deceased, to recover her interest in lands of which he died seized. The defendant claims title under an administrator’s sale made in 1861, and also to be a bona fide purchaser.

The plaintiff claims that no debts were ever proven against the estate; that the real estate of the deceased could only be sold to pay debts; and that at ' the time license was granted to sell the real estate the probate court had lost all jurisdiction in the premises by lapse of time.

*459Crego died August 29, 1856. No…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Allen v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Norman v. OlneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State ex rel. Dana v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Zoellner v. ZoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API