Legal Opinion

Andrus v. Double "Q", Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 11, 1977No. Civ. No. 3-77-347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*9MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This case presents the question of whether the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 requires the District Court to review de novo, in an enforcement proceeding to collect civil penalties, the factual basis of the violations which resulted in the assessment of the penalties, in addition to a de novo review of the amount of those penalties.

The Secretary of the Interior, petitioner herein, represented in this Court by the Attorney General, maintains that the Act requires de novo review of the facts constituting the violations.1

Similarly, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Independent Coal Operators' Assn. v. KleppeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals Er Al.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Department of Labor v. Old Ben Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. F. Boyd Fowler, D/B/A Fowler & Chaney Coal Company and Glen A. Smith, D/B/A Loose Jaw Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. FowlerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API