Legal Opinion

Rothholz v. Stern

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 20, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant has caused to be erected a "metal garage" upon his property at the northwest corner of Stanton place and Pacific avenue, Atlantic City, New Jersey.

The defendant's lot is a part of the land generally known as the "Hemsley Tract," and the particular restriction alleged to be violated is: "4. Private dwellings only shall be erected upon said premises, excepting, however, premises that may hereafter be reserved * * *" (the premises in question have not been reserved).

Although the affidavit of the defendant states the garage to be connected to his dwelling-house, counsel for him…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trainer v. CalefSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murtha v. McGarryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Crowl v. McDuffieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Steiger v. LenociNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Daniels v. Everett, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API