Legal Opinion

Murtha v. McGarry

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainants' bill seeks to restrain the erection, maintenance and use of a private garage structure attached to the dwelling house on defendant's lot — as being in contravention of restrictive covenants contained in defendant's deed and in the deeds of all other owners of lots in that particular neighborhood development.

The covenants in question run with the land; they were created in 1920 and are effective until January 1st, 1935. They provide that the owner —

"Shall not * * * erect * * * upon the * * * premises or any part thereof, any building to be used or occupied for any other purpose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruce v. McCleesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Marsh v. MarshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Trainer v. CalefSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  4. Rothholz v. SternNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Galton v. HeftlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Crowl v. McDuffieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Steiger v. LenociNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Daniels v. Everett, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1966
  5. Noel v. HuvardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API