Legal Opinion

Lee v. Galena-Signal Oil Co. of Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1928No. 9192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrates, J.

This appeal is from orders of the district court of Harris county refusing permission to T. P. Dee to intervene in this suit and appointing therein over his protest a receiver for the Galena-Signal Oil Company of Texas, severally entered in the se-suence stated on the 4th and 6th days of February, 1928; being regularly prosecuted from both these decrees, it plainly lies under the principle applied in Childress v. Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 32 S. W. 330, provided Dee showed such interest in the subject-matter of the litigation as entitled him to be heard before the property could properly go…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. American Creosote Works, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  5. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Allis-Chalmers Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. SilkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Nelson v. Detroit & Security Trust Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Peurifoy v. Hood Rubber Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API