Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Raley v. Royal Ins. Co. Ltd.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 8, 1980No. 79-18Published

1Concurrence

Plaintiffs below claim defendants converted $9143.23, the property of plaintiffs, and further claim punitive damages on the basis that defendants "knowingly and fraudulently" converted plaintiffs' money. The underlying facts of this case are unusual, and the cause of action for conversion of money upon such facts is novel.

The case law of Alabama establishing the essential requisites for the maintenance of a cause of action in conversion has long been firmly established. There are four different actions which constitute conversion: (1) A wrongful taking; (2) an illegal assumption of ownership;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ewing v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  2. Ray Hughes Chevrolet, Inc. v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Roebuck Auto Sales, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Glaze v. M'MillionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  5. Mitchell v. CorbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API