Legal Opinion
(UD)(PS) US Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Schmidt
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 26, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01644Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 United States Secretary of No. 2:19-cv-01644-JAM-KJN Housing and Urban 14 Development, 15 Plaintiff, SUA SPONTE ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT 16 v. 17 Edward Schmidt, 18 Defendant. 19 20 The undersigned revokes any actual or anticipated referral 21 to a Magistrate Judge for the purposes of Findings and 22 Recommendations in this case. See Local Rule 302(d) 23 (“Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rule, a Judge may 24 retain any matter otherwise routinely referred to a Magistrate 25…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Robert H. Harris v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company Kenneth L. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.