Legal Opinion

Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 17, 1944No. 8473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This suit for copyright infringement has been here before. Appellant was the owner of a magazine called The Washingtonian. Its issue for December 1931 contained among other things an article by Rixey Smith entitled “The Mills of the Gods.” This issue carried a notice of copyright. With this issue appellant’s magazine ceased publication. Appellees Pearson and Allen afterwards paid Smith the $50 which appellant had agreed but failed to pay him and used the article, with Smith’s consent, in their book More Merry-Go-Round. Appellee Liveright, Inc., published the book…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Douglas v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MCA, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  4. F.E.L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, and F.E.L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Gordon v. WeirDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API