Legal Opinion

Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 1, 1994No. Civ. S-89-871 LKKPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.

This litigation concerns the allocation of the cost of cleaning up two Superfund sites on the National Priorities List (“NPL”) established pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75. The original suit was brought by Louisiana Pacific (“LP”) against Beazer East, Inc. (“Beazer”). It sought costs expended by both LP and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in the course of investigating those sites. 1 LP also sought declaratory judgment concerning future liability under the Act.…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. California Prolife Council Political Action Committee v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
  2. Anthony v. County of Sacramento, Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  3. Gonya v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. State v. MuellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. Clark v. County of PlacerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API