Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Goettel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 28, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

The writing propounded herein was a double stationer’s printed will blank, consisting of one long sheet folded once, so as to make of it four pages, each eight inches by thirteen inches; and it was so printed that typing the first page would make a fitting carbon copy on the third, and so from second to fourth. After the death of testatrix the sheet was torn in two at the fold; and on. the trial herein, for convenience, one half, consisting of the first and second pages were marked Exhibit 1; and the third and fourth pages Exhibit 2. Each of these exhibits now appear to be a legally…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Christman v. RoeschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Burger v. HillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1850
  3. In re Bedlow's WillNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. In re Providing the Last Will & Testament of TouseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SnideNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of ArnoldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  3. In re the Estate of SnideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. In re the Accounting of ReidyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API