Legal Opinion

In re Providing the Last Will & Testament of Tousey

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Proceedings upon probate of a will.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, S.

— The contestant concedes that the papers offered for probate were duly executed by the decedent as her last will and codicil thereto. The sole ground of contest is based on a recital in the will to the effect that the decedent was unmarried and had no “ direct heirs.” A cousin who had not seen her or communicated with her, either directly or indirectly, for over forty years before her decease, contends that he is a “ direct heir ”; that he was missing and his whereabouts were not known to the members of his immediate family for some years; that the inference to be drawn from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clapp v. . FullertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Skipwith v. Cabell's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1870
  3. Creely v. OstranderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1855
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of MacomberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  2. In re the Estate of McCaffreyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Estate of YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of ArnoldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of GoettelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API