Embden State Bank v. Schulze
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
*783At the outset we are confronted with a motion by the respondent to ■dismiss this appeal upon two grounds; first, that the appeal was not perfected within the statutory time, and second, that the undertaking -of the appellant is insufficient.
The judgment was docketed on February 1, 1922, and personal service of notice of entry of judgment was made and admitted on February 1, 1922. On February 11, 1922, a motion for a new trial was argued before the trial court and was on that date fully submitted. The trial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Jackson v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. BartlettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- JR Watkins Company v. VangenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Nevland v. NjustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Gunsch v. BoehlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.