Legal Opinion

Small v. McMurphy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1895No. 698PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Uvalde. Tried below before Hon. Eugene Archer.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The following are the conclusions of the trial judge, which govern this appeal, there being no statement of facts

1. That the land in controversy was patented to Eandall Jones on the 28th of September, 1847.

2. That Eandall Jones conveyed the land by warranty deed to J. L. Tompkins and plaintiff, G. L. McMurphy, on the 28th day of November, 1865.

3. At the date of conveyance last above named plaintiff was an unmarried man.

4. The plaintiff married on the 17th day of May, 1866, nearly six months after he acquired a half interest in the land by the conveyance from Randall J…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. McIverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Houston Oil Co. v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914
  3. Buchanan v. Houston T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Friedman Oil Corp. v. Southern Oil Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Webster v. International & G. N. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API