Legal Opinion

Mickel v. Norton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 2011No. 2D10-3437PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Michael and Barbara Mickel appeal from a final judgment granting permanent injunctive relief to their neighbors, Robert and Mary Norton. We reverse.

This dispute arose when the Mickels installed a six-foot-high vinyl fence along the property line between their home and the Nortons’ home. The Nortons sued the Mickels alleging the fence constituted a private nuisance and that it violated their “riparian and littoral rights” by obstructing their view of the water. They sought a mandatory injunction requiring removal of the fence and a permanent injunction pro hibiting the Mickels…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benoit v. BenoitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Hayes v. BowmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Broward v. MabrySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  4. Thiesen v. Gulf, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Obolensky v. TrombleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Chiandusse v. GrannisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Jack Kessler v. Alexander AyzenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API