Legal Opinion

Ridge Avenue-Eighth Street Subway Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1937No. Appeals, 254 and 255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These two appeals, arising on different records, one in Common Pleas No. 4 and the other in Common Pleas No. 5, raise the same question and were argued together.

In the one case the Manufacturers’ Club of Philadelphia, and in the other, Mary Ziegenfuss, alleged ownership of property abutting on a street in which the city constructed a subway, and, as part of it, constructed within the street lines in front of each petitioner’s prop erty a kiosk or subway entrance. Each owner filed * a petition for viewers averring in substance that the construction of the kiosk bad…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Locust &8212 Broad (No. 1) &8212 Eighth SubwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Broad Street Subway Case (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Olney Bank and Trust Co. CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API