Legal Opinion

Broad Street Subway Case (No. 2)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1935No. 2; Appeal, 241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

A board of view was appointed on appellant’s petition. He claimed diminution in the market value of his apartment house and lot at the southeast corner of Broad and Dauphin Streets in Philadelphia resulting from the existence in the sidewalk in front of his building of an entrance to the Broad Street Subway (Act of 1913, P. L. 520; Ordinances, 1924, page 113 and page 135). The board heard the case and filed a report in which, among other things, the board held that the claim was barred by limitation. Petitioner excepted. The learned court below dismissed his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Locust &8212 Broad (No. 1) &8212 Eighth SubwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ridge Avenue-Eighth Street Subway CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API