Legal Opinion
in Multi-District Litigation v. A.H. Robins Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1984No. 82CA1324PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
The defendant, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., (Robins) appeals an order of the district court which authorized the release of a videotape deposition for use by several plaintiffs (MDL plaintiffs) in multi-district litigation pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. We affirm.
This proceeding arose out of multi-dis-trict “Daikon Shield” products liability litigation. In May 1979, pre-trial evidentiary hearings were conducted in a Daikon Shield products liability case filed against Robins in Denver District Court. In that trial, Palmer, the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. United Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Kerwin v. DISTRICT COURT & JUDGES, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- McCroskey v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett v. Board of TrusteesColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bradley v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tising v. State Personnel Board of State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bennett v. BD. OF TR. FOR U. OF N. COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984