Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1962No. Civ. 34PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Facts

STONE, J.

These two separate actions were consolidated for trial; judgment of nonsuit was entered in each action; plaintiffs have appealed in both eases. The plaintiffs-appellants in one action are the widow and surviving children of Frank Wesley McKenzie, who was electrocuted when the tip of a television tower which he was employed to help move, touched a high tension line maintained by defendant-respondent, Pacific Gas & Electric Company. The other action was brought by plaintiff-appellant Roy Stumpff, a fellow employee of McKenzie, who suffered serious burns in the same accident.

The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  2. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pierce v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Wright v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Krongos v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API