Legal Opinion
Reproductive Services v. Keating
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1998No. 4:98-cv-00447PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLMES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction by Plaintiff Reproductive Services (Docket # 1) challenging the constitutionality of a provision of the Oklahoma Public Health Code and regulations promulgated by the Oklahoma Department of Health, requiring that all abortions performed “subsequent to the end of the first trimester” be performed in general hospitals. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1 — 731(B); Okla. Admin. Code §§ 310:600-1-1 et seq. Plaintiff filed a brief in support of its position. Defendant filed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004