Legal Opinion · Concurrence

O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2004No. 02-2323Published

1Concurrence

McCONNELL, J., joined by TYMKOVICH, J., concurring, and joined by HARTZ, J., and O’BRIEN, J., as to Part I.

This Court has traditionally required a heightened showing for preliminary injunctions in three “disfavored” categories: injunctions that disturb the status quo, mandatory injunctions, and injunctions that afford the movant substantially all the relief it may recover at the conclusion of a full trial on the merits. SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa USA Inc., 936 F.2d 1096, 1098-99 (10th Cir.1991). We heard this case en banc to consider whether to jettison the heightened standard for preliminary…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API