Legal Opinion
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 1961No. Appeals, 111 and 112PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
These appeals by the B. & O. Railroad involve the validity of tax assessments levied against improved real estate of which it is possessed in the City of Pittsburgh.
The Department of Highways of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in the course of construction of the Penn-Lincoln Parkway East in December 1951, found it necessary to condemn and appropriate certain land and facilities of the railroad located in the City of Pittsburgh. In order to provide land upon which the railroad could relocate and re-establish its facilities, the Commonwealth condemned properties…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fox Film Corp. v. DoyalSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pennsylvania Co. v. BergsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Pennsylvania Stave Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- North Phila. Trust Co. v. Heinel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rowe v. Conners (In Re Rowe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re Appeal of the Board of School Directors of the Owen J. Roberts School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Stendardo v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re: Balaji Investments, LLC, and Savana Properties, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re Stendardo, StendardoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.