Legal Opinion

Matter of Stoltenberg

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1913No. Crim. No. 1795PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

A writ of habeas corpus was issued on the petition of Emma W. Stoltenberg, who was held on a charge of violating a provision of the Tenement House Act of 1911. (Stats. 1911, p. 860.) The complaint against petitioner charged her with the violation of section 85 of the act. That section reads as follows: “No building hereafter constructed as or altered into a tenement house shall be occupied in whole or in part for human habitation until the issuance of a certificate by the health department, . . . that said building conforms in all respects to the requirements of this act relative to the light…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Welch v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Hollywood Cemetery Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. In Re ZhizhuzzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. King v. DavenportIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Klingler v. BickelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. City of Bakersfield v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cooper v. JevneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API