Legal Opinion
Zenith Vinyl Fabrics Corp. v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 11, 1973No. Civ. A. 28333PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAESS, Chief Judge.
This civil action has been brought pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) to recover treble damages for alleged violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2) and Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 18).
Defendant Ford has brought this motion for summary judgment. Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In the spring of 1959, Albert Neulicht, a chemical engineer, was production manager for Lyntex Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, which produced vinyl film. At that time, Melvin Sobel was a distributor of vinyl film. In…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Citizens Nat. Bk., Grant Cty. v. 1ST NAT. BK., MARIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Aaron E. Levine & Co., Inc. v. Calkraft Paper Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- McAlpine v. AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Pennwalt Corp. v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Citizens National Bank v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.